Legal Opinion
Connett v. Automatic Electric Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 15, 1971No. Nos. 70 C 1985, 70 C 1986 and 70 C 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are each suing their employer, Automatic Electric Company, under Section 9 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.App. § 459 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), claiming that they are entitled to certain vacation benefits under their collective bargaining agreement which would have accrued to them but for the temporary termination of their employment for active duty in the armed services of the United States. The issue presented to this Court for resolution is whether vacation benefits…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- James Alvado v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Siaskiewicz v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Eagar v. Magma Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Magma Copper Company, San Manuel Division, a Corporation v. Stephen R. Eagar, Ray F. Stephens, James v. Mork, and Levi D. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas C. Ewert v. Wrought Washer Mfg. Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Ewert v. Wrought Washer Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
- Fees v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Lipani v. Bohack Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1973
- Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.