Legal Opinion

James Alvado v. General Motors Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 8, 1956No. 23190_1PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Vacation pay does not come within those provisions of 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 308(c), * ensuring restoration of a veteran’s rights without loss of seniority, but within the provision that a veteran “a'thall be entitled to participate in insurance or other benefits of fered by the employer pursuant to established rules and practices relating to employees on furlough or leave of absence in effect with the employer at the time such person was inducted” into the Armed Forces. See Siaskiewicz v. General Electric Company, 2 Cir., 166 F.2d 463, 465-466; Dwyer v. Crosby…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Mayhew, Huston v. DEISTERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. García López v. Méndez GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  4. Wozniczka v. McKEANIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API