Legal Opinion

Lipani v. Bohack Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 21, 1973No. Nos. 73-C-740, 73-C-742PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, District Judge.

This is a consolidated action instituted by two employees of the defendant, Bohack Corporation (“Bohack”), under the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C. App. § 459 (“the Act”), to recover vacation benefits for the year they returned from military service to the employment of the defendant. Bohack claims that plaintiffs are not entitled to vacation pay because they did not satisfy the work requirement of the defendant’s collective bargaining agreement for the year they returned and therefore did not earn the claimed benefits. The issue is whether or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. John E. Kasmeier v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Robert E. Morton v. Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anthony M. Lipani v. Bohack Corporation, Robert Loesch v. Bohack CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API