Legal Opinion
Ewert v. Wrought Washer Mfg. Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 8, 1971No. 69-C-378PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TEHAN, Senior District Judge.
By cross-motions for summary judgment the parties to this action pursuant to Title 50 U.S.C. App. § 459(d) present the legal question of whether each of the plaintiffs is entitled to vacation pay for the vacation year in which he returned from military service in the Armed Forces of the United States by virtue of Title 50 U.S.C. App. § 459. The plaintiffs’ brief in support of their motion contains a statement of facts, not disputed by the defendant, which is incorporated herein by reference. The sole question is whether the vacation pay claimed is a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eagar v. Magma Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Magma Copper Company, San Manuel Division, a Corporation v. Stephen R. Eagar, Ray F. Stephens, James v. Mork, and Levi D. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Earl R. Foster v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Thomas C. Ewert v. Wrought Washer Mfg. Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Fees v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Earl R. Foster v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973