Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 18, 1973No. 21, Docket 73-1287Published

1DissentFriendly, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) :

Agreeing that this case is governed by the principles set out in Accardi v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 383 U.S. 225, 86 S.Ct. 768, 15 L.Ed.2d 717 (1966), I dissent from the conclusion that Accardi requires us to hold that the severance benefit here at issue is a perquisite of seniority. If it is not that but rather one of the “other benefits offered by the employer relating to employees on furlough or leave of absence in effect with the employer at the time such person was inducted into such forces,” Palma-rozzo must lose, since it is agreed that time on furlough or leave of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Eagar v. Magma Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Germann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. John E. Kasmeier v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API