Legal Opinion

Fees v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1971No. Civ. A. 70-198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOURLEY, District Judge.

This civil non-jury proceeding has been brought by plaintiff to require defendant to grant him vacation pay pursuant to § 9(d) of the Selective Service Act of 1967 (the Act), 50 U.S.C.A. § 459(d).

Very simply stated, the problem presented is that of a returning serviceman who, after being drafted into the service of his country, now seeks to obtain one week’s vacation pay for 1968, the year of his return and reinstatement by his employer to his former job. Plaintiff’s position is that he is entitled to the vacation pay based on his seniority, i. e. that this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Eagar v. Magma Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Magma Copper Company, San Manuel Division, a Corporation v. Stephen R. Eagar, Ray F. Stephens, James v. Mork, and Levi D. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Earl R. Foster v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Earl R. Foster v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API