Legal Opinion

Stromsodt v. Parke-Davis and Company

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided September 28, 1966No. Civ. 3992PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RONALD N. DAVIES, District Judge.

This is a product liability case tried to the Court without jury, involving the ethical drug Quadrigen made by the Defendant, Parke-Davis and Company, containing four antigens: diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine and poliomyelitis vaccine. It was also described as a quadruple antigen with a prophylaxis against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and poliomyelitis. Jurisdictional requirements of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, have been met.

The Plaintiff was originally shown as “Robert M. Stromsodt, guardian ad litem of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Lang v. General Motors CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Everett Melvin Roberts v. United States of America, and Union Carbide Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  5. Ebers v. General Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Parke-Davis and Company, a Corporation v. Shane Stromsodt, a Minor, by Robert M. Stromsodt, His Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. Tinnerholm v. Parke Davis & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API