Legal Opinion

Parke-Davis and Company, a Corporation v. Shane Stromsodt, a Minor, by Robert M. Stromsodt, His Guardian Ad Litem

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1969No. 18743_1PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEHAFFY, Circuit Judge.

This (diversity products liability action)) instituted pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, involves a multiple antigen product marketed by Parke-Davis and Company under its trade name “Quadrigen.” This product was intended for use in simultaneous immunization against four major diseases of children: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough) and poliomyelitis. Shane Stromsodt, a minor, by amended complaint brought this action by Robert M. Stromsodt, his father and guardian ad litem. Appellee will sometimes hereafter be referred to as plaintiff and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Sidney Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Mrs. Jewell Schenebeck and Russell Schenebeck v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. Cunningham v. Charles Pfizer & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API