Legal Opinion

Bedell & Warden v. Scruton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Heard on an agreed statement, June Term, 1880, Powers, J., presiding. Judgment, pro forma, for the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Royce, Ch. J.

This case was heard upon an agreed statement of facts; from which it appears that in 1874 the defendant, then and now a resident of Vermont, contracted a debt to the plaintiffs, then and now residents of New Hampshire, for meat. In 1879 the defendant filed a petition in insolvency, and in due course obtained his discharge, under the provisions of the act of 1876. The plaintiffs were notified of the insolvency proceedings, but did not prove their claim ; and while said proceedings were pending, brought this suit and attached property…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. D'Arcy v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Suydam v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  5. Boyle v. ZacharieSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scamman v. BonslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bean v. LoryeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hornick, More & Porterfield v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McDougall v. PageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882
  5. Rhodes v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API