Legal Opinion

Bean v. Loryea

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1889No. 12335PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This action was upon a judgment rendered in the supreme court of the state of New York in and for the city and county of New York. Judgment was rendered as prayed for, and from it and an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals. He makes the point in favor of his demand, that the certificate of the. clerk of the court authenticating the copy of the record of the judgment obtained in New York is not sufficient, because it does not show that the clerk was the legal keeper nor where the legal custody of such records belong, and the certificate of the judge as “presiding justice”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Bank of NewburySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. McBride v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Larrabee v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Bedell & Warden v. ScrutonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882
  5. Wallace v. EldredgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Scamman v. BonslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Miller v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Gould v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Butler v. BolingerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API