Legal Opinion

Suydam v. Broadnax

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 26, 1840PublishedCited by 97 opinions

ON a certificate of division from the Circuit Court of the United States, of the Southern District of Alabama. An action was instituted in the Circuit Court of Alabama by-Henry A. Suydam and William Boyd, against the defendants, as administrators of David Newton, on a promissory note given by him to the plaintiffs.

Read the full summary

ON a certificate of division from the Circuit Court of the United States, of the Southern District of Alabama. An action was instituted in the Circuit Court of Alabama by-Henry A. Suydam and William Boyd, against the defendants, as administrators of David Newton, on a promissory note given by him to the plaintiffs. On the trial of the cause the following questions arose, on which the judges of the Circuit Court were divided, and the same were certified to this Coqrt. 1st. Is the plea that the estate of the said decedent is insolvent, sufficient in law to abate the said action ? 2d. If the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wayne

This case has .been sent to this Court upon a certificate of division of opinion between the judges of the Circuit Court of the Southern District of Alabama.

Suydam and Boyd, partners in trade, citizens of the state of New York, sue the defendants as administrators of David Newton, upon a promissory note given by the intestate to the plaintiff, dated New York, September 1st, 1835, payable in twelve months.

The defendants, as we are left to gather from a most imperfect record — for- the pleadings, except the declaration, are not given— plead in abat .cut of the suit, that the estate represented…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API