Rhodes v. Borden
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Fresno, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The action is upon promissory notes made by defendant payable to plaintiff) and delivered to the latter’s agent in Fresno County; no place of payment specified. At the trial it was shown that the plaintiff) from a date long prior to the making of the notes, had been a citizen and continuously a resident of Alabama. The notes were made subsequently to the enactment of the insolvent law of this State. The only question is whether the discharge of defendant from his debts, under that law, is a bar to the action.
In the year 1812 it was determined by the Supreme Court of New York that discharge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Hyde v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Suydam v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scamman v. BonslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bean v. LoryeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In Re DePassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Stone v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889