Scamman v. Bonslett
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of tbe Superior Court of Butte County quashing and recalling executions. John C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SEAKLS, C.
About November 20, 1894, Francesca B. Scam-man, as executrix of the last will of Henry Scamman, deceased, brought an action in the superior court in and for the county of Butte to foreclose a mortgage executed by A. Bonslett, August 1, 1889, to secure the payment of his promissory note for eight thousand five hundred dollars of even date, payable five years after date, with interest made and payable in this state.
The complaint averred that the defendant, A. Bonslett, had been on the-day of October, 1894, adjudged and declared to be an insolvent debtor upon his petition filed under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Wharton v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bostwick v. McEvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Blondeau v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Thomson v. L. C. Roney & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.