Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Hale
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 11, 1864PublishedCited by 250 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
68 U.S. 223 (1863)
1 Wall. 223
BALDWIN
v.
HALE.
Supreme Court of United States.
Messrs. Hutchins & Wheeler for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. F.A. Brooks for the creditor, Hale.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court:
Contract was made in Boston and was to be performed at the place where it was made, and upon that ground it is contended by the defendant that the certificate of discharge is a complete bar to the action. But the case shows that the plaintiff was a citizen of Vermont, and inasmuch as he did not prove his debt against the defendant's estate in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Boswell's Lessee v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Suydam v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Nations v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by250 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.