Vandiford v. Stewart Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
The issue before this Court is whether plaintiff’s injury and disability from his October 1984 accident arose out of or was in the course of his employment. For these injuries to be compensable, they must result from an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment. Barham v. Food World, Inc., 300 N.C. 329, 332, 266 S.E.2d 676, 678 reh’ing denied, 300 N.C. 562, 270 S.E.2d 105 (1980). A subsequent injury to an employee, whether an aggravation of the original injury or a new and distinct injury, is compensable only if it is the direct and natural result of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Starr v. Charlotte Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cooper v. Cooper Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Barnhardt v. N.C. Department of TransportationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011
- Busque v. Mid-America Apartment CommunitiesNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2009
- Conner v. City of RaleighNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1998
- Deason v. Owens-IllinoisNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.