Legal Opinion

Oliver Typewriter Co. v. Vance

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1911No. 7,140PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom Payette Circuit Court; George L. Gray, Judge. Action by Charles P. Yance against the Oliver Typewriter Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, P. J.

Appellee recovered judgment against appellant for $70, from which this appeal is taken.

The errors assigned are: (1) The amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and (2) the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The new trial was asked on the grounds that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law, and that the damages are excessive.

The amended complaint averred, in substance, that appellee was employed by appellant, at its special instance and request, as its representative and salesman, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Xenia Real Estate Co. v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Gish v. GishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. ReillyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Hillyard v. RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Judy v. WoodsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Rooker v. Ludowici Celadon Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Washburn-Crosby Milling Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API