Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Reilly

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1912No. 7,663PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Superior Court of Marion County (72,889); Clarence E. Weir, Judge. Action by Maurice F. Reilly against Walter J. Hubbard. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHotted, C. J.

— Action on a contractor’s bond. On July 31, 1906, appellee entered into a written contract with the firm of Phelan & Moore, contractors, for the erection of a dwelling-house. To secure the faithful performance of such a contract a bond was given, with appellant as surety.

Appellee brought this action against appellant alone as surety on said bond. There was a judgment in favor of appellee for $566.13 and $50 attorney’s fees, and from this judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

1. The issues of fact were presented by a complaint in one paragraph and a general denial. A demurrer to the complaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weir Plow Co. v. WalmsleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. City of Lafayette v. JamesIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Phillbrook v. EmswilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Dunlap v. EdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Foster v. GastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. M. H. Walker Realty Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Indiana Telco Federal Credit Union v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. BushongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Snodgrass v. ShaderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API