Peters v. Banta
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.
This case originated in the Cass Circuit Court, and the venue changed to the Pulaski Circuit Court. It is an action to recover the possession of real estate, the appellee being the plaintiff in the court below.
Catherine Peters and Margaret Eeam filed cross-complaints, and there were several answers and replies filed by the parties.
The appellants Margaret Eeam and Catherine Peters assign separate errors, and the said 'appellants, together with the appellant Abraham Pete.rs, assign joint errors.
The following are the errors assigned by the appellant Eeam :
1. The complaint does not state facts…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Glantz v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Krutz v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Davis v. KrugIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Nichols v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KiddIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. McCullomIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Citizens' Street Railroad v. WilloebyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.