Legal Opinion

Xenia Real Estate Co. v. Macy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1897No. 17,987PublishedCited by 46 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This appeal was taken from a judgment and decree granting appellee a perpetual injunction against appellants with damages. Each appellant assigned as error:

1. The amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

2. The court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial.

3. The court erred in overruling appellants’ motion to modify the judgment and decree.

The amended complaint, so far as necessary to the determination of the questions, presented, is substantially as follows: “During the year p.892, the Xenia Real Estate Company was a corporation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MoormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Citizens' Street Railroad v. WilloebyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Indianapolis Cabinet Co. v. HerrmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Whiteman v. Fayette Fuel-Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KiddIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Muehlman v. KeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Standard Oil Company of Texas v. Lopeno Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Meyer v. Town of BoonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API