Legal Opinion

Hillyard v. Robbins

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1913No. 7,901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom. Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, Judge. Action by James L. Robbins against Prank Hillyard and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, P. J.

— This is a suit by appellee against appellants to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The complaint in substance charges: that appellant, McEnderfer, was and still is the owner in fee simple of certain lots in Cottage Grove Addition to the city of Huntington; that by mistake the lot on which the house was built for which the lien is asked was described as lots 30 and 31, but the house was actually built on lot 32; that appellants and appellee entered into a contract by which appellee agreed to furnish labor in the erection of a dwelling house on said real estate; that in compliance with such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Raymond v. WathenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Smith v. NewbaurIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Citizens Street Railroad v. HeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Consolidated Stone Co. v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McNamee v. RauckIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Paxton v. FerrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Portland Foundry & Machine Co. v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Froberg v. Northern Indiana Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Deal v. PlassIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API