Legal Opinion
Ginsburg v. Agora, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 14, 1995No. Civil Action WMN 95-125PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Paper No. 7. Plaintiff has opposed the motion, and Defendants have replied. Upon a review of the motion and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that Defendants’ motion will be granted and the case dismissed.
I. BACKGROUND
This action involves issues of liability for alleged false and misleading statements contained in an investment newsletter entitled “John Pugsley’s Journal” [“the Journal”]. Defendant John Pugsley is the author of the Journal;…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reynolds v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- R&W Technical Services Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Agora, Inc. v. Axxess, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- In Re Factor VIII or IX Concentrate Blood Products LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MappDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.