Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 2006No. 2-03-294-CVPublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

After reconsidering our prior opinion on appellant Ernest Reynolds Ill’s motion for rehearing and request for rehearing en banc, we deny the motion and request for rehearing en banc, but we withdraw our July 14, 2005 opinion and judgment and substitute the following in their place in order to clarify and correct parts of our original opinion.1

Introduction

This case of first impression involves the potential liability of an author and publisher of an investment-related *257newsletter to a subscriber who alleges that he incurred losses as a result of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. in the Interest of M.R. and W.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  2. Paciwest, Inc. v. Warner Alan Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Thomas v. Uzoka, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Fieldtech Avionics & Instruments, Inc. v. Component Control. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Poag v. FloriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API