Legal Opinion

Sasario v. Calo

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn R. Tenney, J.

The defendants in the above foreclosure action claim an interest in the surplus moneys arising from the sale of the mortgaged premises. They now ask the court pursuant to section 1361 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law to determine the amount due to the respective judgment creditors and to make distribution of the surplus. The judgment creditors are of two types. The first group has a judgment against the husband and wife who are the owners of the property as tenants by the entirety. The remaining group has judgments against the husband only. Of course, any liens attaching to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of McKelwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. In Re the Final Accounting of Executors of AlbrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. In Re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Nutt v. . CumingNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Dunning v. . Ocean National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mojeski v. SiegmannNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Security Trust Co. v. Miller, New York County Courts1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API