Legal Opinion

South Shore Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Gundel

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Liff, J.

This is a motion to confirm the Referee’s report as to surplus moneys in a foreclosure proceeding, and directing the Treasurer of Nassau County to pay the surplus moneys herein pursuant to said report.

The motion is opposed by the plaintiff, South Shore Federal Savings and Loan Association, as to that portion which provides for $967.37 to be held by the Treasurer of Nassau County as property belonging to the owners of the equity of redemption as tenants by the entirety and to be held until the decease of either of them. The plaintiff claims that the proceeds are personalty and held by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Secrist v. SecristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Franklin Square National Bank v. SchillerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. East River Savings Bank v. KindNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bennett v. FishNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mojeski v. SiegmannNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Security Trust Co. v. Miller, New York County Courts1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API