Legal Opinion

Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 16, 2001No. AC 20660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Thomas J. Niehaus, appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Cowles Business Media, Inc. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact after finding, as a matter of law, that a contract, pursuant to which the plaintiff participated in the sale to the defendant of the company that employed him, was clear and unambiguous on its face, and was not susceptible to more than one possible interpretation. We dismiss the appeal.

The following facts and procedural history are undisputed. In…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Bank of America, FSB v. FrancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Centerbank v. GrossConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Johnson v. MazzaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Loricco v. PantaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API