Legal Opinion
Loricco v. Pantani
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 22, 2002No. AC 20570PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
In this mortgage foreclosure action, the defendants Edmund L. Pantani (Edmund) and T. Maire Pantani (Maire)1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court determining the amount of mortgage debt due the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, (2) struck the case from the jury docket, (3) ruled that the defendants’ recoupment claim was barred by the statute of limitations, (4) granted the plaintiffs motion for a special finding and (5) awarded interest in an amount greater than that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Benvenuti Oil Co. v. Foss Consultants, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Brehm v. BrehmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Genovese v. J. N. Clapp Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- LaSalle National Bank v. Freshfield Meadows, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- City of West Haven v. NorbackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Fezollari v. JauzovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Fox v. Arsenault, No. Cv 01-0804352s (Dec. 9, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Lapointe v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015