Legal Opinion

Centerbank v. Gross

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 13, 1993No. 11632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a supplemental judgment rendered after a deficiency hearing. The defendants, Robert G. Gross, Carol A. Dellebovi and Donald L. St. John, Sr., assert that the trial court’s factual finding regarding the fair market value of the subject property was incorrect. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

“When the factual basis of the trial court’s decision is challenged on appeal, the role of this court is to determine whether the facts set out in the . . . decision are supported by the evidence or whether, in light of the evidence and the pleadings in the whole record, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. State v. HoeplingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Oakes v. New England Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Cupina v. BernklauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HansenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Bank of America, FSB v. FrancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API