Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Mazza
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 11, 2003No. AC 23387PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The plaintiff, Harolyn Johnson, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the defendant’s1 motion to strike the revised amended complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) struck the complaint and (2) rendered summary judgment on a complaint that previously had been withdrawn. We affirm the judgment of the trial court in part and reverse it in part.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a five year lease for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Jewish Home for Elderly of Fairfield County, Inc. v. CantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Barber v. JacobsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Zanoni v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Kufferman v. Fairfield UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Santana v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Parker v. GINSBURG DEVELOPMENT CT, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Connecticut Carpenters Benefit Funds v. Burkhard Hotel Partners II, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Homecomings Financial Network, Inc. v. StarbalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Pedrini v. KiltonicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.