Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1930No. Docket No. 444PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.
This is an appeal from an order and judgment restraining the defendant Irrigation District from discontinuing or shutting off a supply of water, and from raising the rate of the service of such water until such time as such, action should be authorized, either by the Railroad Commission of the state of California or by the City of San Diego. The action was submitted to the trial court upon stipulated facts, which were adopted by the court as its findings. The agreed facts may be briefly stated as follows: For some time prior to April 5, 1924, the Cuyamaca Water Company was a public utility…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Marin Water & Power Co. v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Fellows v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Coronado v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Turlock Irrigation District v. ZankerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Security Pacific National Bank v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971