Fellows v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to enjoin the defendants from cutting off the water flowing in a certain pipe to "the plaintiff’s premises, and to compel the defendants to furnish water to certain other premises belonging to the plaintiff. The court below sustained a general demurrer to the ■complaint, and thereupon gave judgment in favor of the ■defendants, from which plaintiff appeals.
The facts upon which plaintiff relies are as follows: The ■city of Los Angeles was the owner of a tract of land inside the city limits near the east boundary thereof, and nearly two acres in extent, on which were flowing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Vernon Irrigation Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Durant v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.