Legal Opinion
American Metal Fabricators Co. v. Goldman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1605PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Oercone, J.,
We have here an appeal from the dismissal of a complaint filed against additional party defendants. The order granting preliminary objections and dismissing the additional party complaint is final and appeal-able: Brandywine Area Joint School Authority v. Vancor, Inc., 426 Pa. 448 (1967).
Plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit and trespass against its attorneys, William L. Goldman and Robert J. Hastings, the defendants, to recover damages which allegedly resulted from the defendants’ failure to apprise plaintiff of a defect in the title to land in Bristol Township,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Rau v. MankoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Snoparsky v. BAERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Oppenhuizen v. WennerstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. FetnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Svetz for Svetz v. Land Tool Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Szemanski v. Vulcan Materials Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Threlkeld v. Haskins Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Brennan v. Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.