Szemanski v. Vulcan Materials Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
Have the 1969 amendments to Pa.R.C.P. 2252 altered the prior rule which prevented the joinder of an express indemnitor as an additional defendant? The trial court held that such a joinder was improper. We reverse.
The circumstances which have brought this issue before us are as follows. United Industrial Maintenance, Inc. (United) agreed to do repair work on a crane owned by Vulcan Materials Company (Vulcan), and located on the latter’s premises. The written contract contained a clause by which United agreed to indemnify Vulcan against “all losses and all claims, demands,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Kravas v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- American Metal Fabricators Co. v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stokes v. Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 696Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Baker v. Magnetic Analysis Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hall v. Goodman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Beary v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Eads v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.