Legal Opinion

Szemanski v. Vulcan Materials Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1979No. 1373PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Have the 1969 amendments to Pa.R.C.P. 2252 altered the prior rule which prevented the joinder of an express indemnitor as an additional defendant? The trial court held that such a joinder was improper. We reverse.

The circumstances which have brought this issue before us are as follows. United Industrial Maintenance, Inc. (United) agreed to do repair work on a crane owned by Vulcan Materials Company (Vulcan), and located on the latter’s premises. The written contract contained a clause by which United agreed to indemnify Vulcan against “all losses and all claims, demands,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Kravas v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. American Metal Fabricators Co. v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stokes v. Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 696Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Baker v. Magnetic Analysis Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Hall v. Goodman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Beary v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Eads v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API