Legal Opinion

Oppenhuizen v. Wennersten

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1966No. Docket 406PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, P. J.

Harry Oppenhuizen, plaintiffappellee, brought an action against Carl Wenner sten, defendant-appellee, and Howard M. Veneklasen, defendant-appellant. Trial before the circuit judge without a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff against defendant Wennersten for actual damages because of failure of consideration and against Veneldasen based on fraud for $1,768 actual damages and $500 exemplary damages. Judgment for exemplary damages of $250 was also awarded in favor of defendant-appellee Wennersten upon his cross complaint based on fraud against defendant Veneldasen.

Defendant-app…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wetherbee v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Wilson v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ten Hopen v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Stuyvesant v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Ralph Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Raymond R. Wiskotoni v. Michigan National Bank-WestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API