Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1982No. 479PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of compulsory non-suit entered in favor of defendant, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, at the close of the plaintiffs’ case. The plaintiffs, Brennan, Murphy and Stierheim, filed a timely motion to remove or take off the non-suit which was denied and this appeal followed. Appellants contend that the non-suit was improperly granted because their suit in trespass and assumpsit against their former attorney for alleged malpractice in causing or failing to prevent their violation of the Pennsylvania Securities Act is a valid and proper action…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,512 Marvyn Gould, of the Estate of J. Donald Rogasner, in No. 75-1338. v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. deHaas v. Empire Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McCarter v. MitchamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Bresson v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. Gruber v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Gruber v. Price WaterhouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Bull v. American Bank and Trust Co. of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API