Brennan v. Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of compulsory non-suit entered in favor of defendant, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, at the close of the plaintiffs’ case. The plaintiffs, Brennan, Murphy and Stierheim, filed a timely motion to remove or take off the non-suit which was denied and this appeal followed. Appellants contend that the non-suit was improperly granted because their suit in trespass and assumpsit against their former attorney for alleged malpractice in causing or failing to prevent their violation of the Pennsylvania Securities Act is a valid and proper action…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,512 Marvyn Gould, of the Estate of J. Donald Rogasner, in No. 75-1338. v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- deHaas v. Empire Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McCarter v. MitchamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Bresson v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Gruber v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Gruber v. Price WaterhouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Bull v. American Bank and Trust Co. of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.