Octane Oil v. Blankenship-Antilley I.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Blankenship-Antilley Implement Company, a corporation, sued Octane Oil Refining Company, a corporation, Baird Refining Company, a corporation, and R. O. Anderson and Nat Anderson, alleged to be operating as New Deal Marketing Company, for labor done and materials and parts furnished by plaintiff in the repair of a truck. Plaintiff alleged that the labor was performed and the parts furnished "at the instance and request of defendants" and that "said repairs were contracted for by defendants"; that at the time the work was done Octane Oil Refining Company and Baird Refining Company were the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simmonds v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. RunnelsTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Coats v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Cheatham v. RiddleTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Thraves v. HooserTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pilkington v. Kornell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Hunt v. Ellisor & Tanner, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Page v. LockleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Slay v. Mary Couts Burnett TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Lawson v. HutchersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.