Legal Opinion

Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. Runnels

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1898No. 715PublishedCited by 82 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Kacogdoches County. The railway company obtained a writ of error upon the affirmance by the appellate court of a judgment recovered against it by Runnels and from which it had appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

We copy the following facts found by the Court of Civil Appeals:

“Appellee, who was a woodchopper in the employment of the appellant, and as such was accustomed to traveling upon passes upon freight trains over its road, on the 11th day of July, 1896, at Houston, procured a pass entitling him to travel from that place to Humble. He resided near the railroad at a point about three miles beyond Humble from Houston. There was a wood yard near his home at which such trains sometimes stopped to take on wood. He entered a freight train and traveled upon it to and beyond…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. Bassett & BassettTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Coats v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Cheatham v. RiddleTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Davidson v. WallingfordTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. P. J. Willis & Brother v. WhitsittTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Thraves v. HooserTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. American Surety Co. v. WhiteheadTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n of Missouri v. MuhlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API