Legal Opinion

Slay v. Mary Couts Burnett Trust

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 7, 1944No. 2420PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Dr. Charles H. Harris, E. E. Bewley, Charles F. Roeser, Mark McMahon, and W. K. Stripling, as trustees of the Mary Couts Burnett Trust, brought this suit for the use and benefit of said Trust and its beneficiary, Texas Christian University. The defendants are W. H. Slay, U. M. Simon, W. C. Proctor, Ray E. Long-mire and Martha Roberta Sweatt, sole beneficiary and independent executrix of the will of John H. Sweatt, deceased, who died in July, 1941, while his depositions were being taken in this case. The original petition was filed on March 7, 1941. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Slay v. Burnett TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Houston Lumber Supply Company v. WockenfussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Markwardt v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Wedegartner v. ReichertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Westwood Independent School District v. Southern Clay Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API