Legal Opinion

Thraves v. Hooser

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1932No. 1496—5776PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

W. V. Thraves brought this suit against John W. Hooser, and in substance alleged that the suit was based upon a contract made in the form of a letter dated January 6, 1925, and thereafter amended. This contract is made part of the petition and marked Exhibit A; that Hooser was the owner of certain oil leases in Navarro county and other parts of Texas; that by the letter he agreed with Thraves that a Delaware corporation should be chartered with a capital stock of $5,000,-000 par value, divided into shares of $100 each, and these shares divided into two sections of 100,000 shares of class B…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Sonnentheil v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. RunnelsTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Bradstreet Co. v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1888

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Gleason v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Kimmell v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Lang v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Clinkenbeard v. Central Southwest Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API