Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Ellisor & Tanner, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 15, 1987No. 05-86-01029-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITHAM, Justice.

The issues in the present case center on the architect’s obligation under his contract with the owner to observe the progress of the work and to endeavor to guard the owner against defects in the work. The owner-appellants, W.H. Hunt and A.P. Stephens, doing business as Hunt-Stephens Investments, a partnership, appeal from a judgment on the jury’s verdict in favor of the architect-appellee, Ellisor & Tanner, Inc. We conclude that the contract does not exculpate Ellisor & Tanner from liability. We conclude further that the trial court erred in asking the jury to compare the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bradshaw v. Baylor UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. American Airlines, Inc. v. United States of America and Sara Ann Creasy, Sara Ann Creasy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. CTTI Priesmeyer, Inc. v. K & O LTD. PARTNERSHIP, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. City of Austin v. Houston Lighting & Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Romero v. Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  4. Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & FolleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Black + Vernooy Architects v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API