Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pilkington v. Kornell

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 17, 1991No. 05-90-01513-CVPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant, Lori A. Pilkington, sued appel-lee, Beverly M. Kornell, for compensatory and punitive damages allegedly suffered as a result of an automobile accident. The jury determined that Kornell’s negligence proximately caused the accident but that Kornell was not grossly negligent. The jury awarded Pilkington some past and future medical expenses, but the jury found that Pilkington failed to prove that she suffered any damages which merited compensation for past and future (1) pain, suffering and mental anguish, (2) lost earning capacity, or (3) physical impairment.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Leyva v. PachecoTexas Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Monroe v. Grider, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  3. Vincent v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Kirkpatrick v. Memorial Hospital of Garland, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  5. Lamb v. Franklin, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API