Murphy v. Stelling
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal by P. E. Stelling from a judgment rendered against him for damages upon breach of warranty upon a sale of certain apricot trees.
The action was brought against F. E. Stelling and Edward Stelling, but judgment went against F. E. Stelling only, and he alone appeals.
The appeal comes to this court upon the judgment-roll alone, without any bill of exceptions, and was taken more than sixty days after the rendition and entry of judgment.
In the opening brief of appellant but two points are made as grounds for a reversal of the judgment. The first is that appellant’s demurrer should…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Wright v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Landon v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bock v. Hamilton Square Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.