Hardesty v. SERVICE MERCHANDISE CO. INC.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
FARMER, Judge.
This appeal is taken from the trial court’s order of June 7, 1995, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Service Merchandise Company, Inc. (hereinafter, “Service Merchandise”). Specifically, the trial court found that there was no proof of a dangerous condition created by Service Merchandise and no proof that Service Merchandise had either actual or constructive notice that a dangerous condition existed. Upon consideration of the record before us, the trial court’s order is affirmed.
FACTS
Erma Hardesty (hereinafter, “Mrs. Har-desty” or “Hardesty”), traveled from her…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Foster v. Amcon International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Jones v. Zayre, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Benson v. H.G. Hill Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Arrambide v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Basily v. Rain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Sandra Morris v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Suzanne Bradley v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.