Legal Opinion

Foster v. Amcon International, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1981PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

We granted plaintiff’s application for permission to appeal in order to determine whether the actions of the trial court in granting an additur, and the Court of Appeals in reinstating the jury verdict, were proper. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $500.00. The trial judge on plaintiff’s “Motion for a New Trial or an Additur” increased the jury verdict to $15,000.00. The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial judge and restored the judgment of the jury.

Plaintiff contends that she sustained injuries and damages as a result of a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  2. Monday v. MillsapsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SmithwickTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Reeves v. CatignaniTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Ballard v. HerzkeTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Benson v. Tennessee Valley Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  4. Tamarin Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  5. Aundrey MEALS Ex Rel. William MEALS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 2013

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API