Legal Opinion

Merkel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Jeffrey Merkel (Claimant) 1 petitions for review of the July 31, 2006, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to deny and dismiss Claimant’s review petition. We affirm.

Claimant filed a review petition, alleging that Hofmann Industries, Inc. (Employer) incorrectly calculated Claimant’s average weekly wage (AWW) in connection with Claimant’s March 13, 1998, work injury. In response, Employer filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that, in 1999, Claimant filed a review petition raising the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Burke v. Pittsburgh Limestone Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Henion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Colpetzer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weney v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Callowhill Center Associates, LLC v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Patton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API