Legal Opinion

Colpetzer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2005No. 63, 194 MAP 2003PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

In Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Bd. (Snyder, Jr.), 575 Pa.66, 834 A.2d 524 (2003), this Court recently considered whether, under Section 309(d) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, see 77 P.S. § 582(d), the General Assembly intended that a seriously and permanently injured full-time worker, whose three months of full-time employment was immediately preceded by part-time after-school employment, should be penalized by having the periods of his part-time scholastic employment included in the calculation of his average weekly wage (“AWW”). The Hannaberry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Triangle Building Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Colpetzer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Snizaski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Reifsnyder v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Merkel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Ballerino v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API