Legal Opinion

Burke v. Pittsburgh Limestone Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1953No. Appeal, No. 95PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

This is a proceeding for a declaratory judgment. We have decided to accept such proceedings even *392though under the facts a common law action could have been brought. See Philadelphia Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Rose, 364 Pa. 15, 70 A. 2d 316.

In 1912 I. E. Anthony and wife, being the owners of 50 acres of land in Armstrong County, “granted, bargained, sold, let and leased” to Pittsburgh Limestone Company Ltd. all the limestone under 50 acres of land, with, inter alia, the right to mine and remove that mineral. In consideration thereof the company…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. CliftSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Zerbe Township School District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Kuchinic v. McCrorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Bearoff v. Bearoff Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Stevenson v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API