Legal Opinion

Hettinga v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 31, 2007No. Civil Action 06-1637 (RJL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Hein and Ellen Hettinga d/b/a Sarah Farms, seek to have this Court declare unconstitutional two provisions of the Milk Regulatory Equity Act of 2006, Pub.L. No. 109-215, 120 Stat. 328 (Apr. 11, 2006) (the “MREA”) and to permanently enjoin the application of that statute to plaintiffs. Before this Court is the United States’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. For the following reasons, this Court GRANTS defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

BACKG…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. RuzickaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Scandinavian Satellite System, AS v. Prime TV Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Ezra T. Benson, Secretary of Agriculture v. Arthur Schofield, New England Milk Producers' Association, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Arthur SchofieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Koretoff v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Hettinga v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Hettinga v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Koretoff v. SchaeferDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API