Legal Opinion
United States v. Ruzicka
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 16, 1946No. 54PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
We brought this case here, 327 U. S. 776, because it raises questions of importance in the administration of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937. 50 Stat. 246, 7 U. S. C. § 601 et seq. The general scheme of the Act and its operation have been before us in a series of cases. United States v. Rock Royal Co-op., 307 U. S. 533; United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co., 315 U. S. 110; Stark v. Wickard, 321 U. S. 288. Our immediate concern is with the provisions of the Act that distribute enforcing authority between the courts and the Secretary of Agriculture. These become relevant to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Avocados Plus Inc v. Veneman, Ann M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.