Legal Opinion

Hettinga v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 16, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2006-1637Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HEIN HETTINGA AND ELLEN ) HETTINGA d/b/a SARAH FARMS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-1637 (RJL) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) De~ndant ) h- MEMORANDUM OPINION (March r-S-, 2011) [#44] Plaintiffs Hein and Ellen Hettinga d/b/a Sarah Farms ("plaintiffs"), bring this action against the United States ("defendant" or "Government") as a facial challenge to the constitutionality of two provisions of the Milk Regulatory Equity Act of 2005 ("MREA"),

Pub. L. No. 109-215, 120

Stat. 328 (2006) (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 608c).…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API