Legal Opinion

Hettinga v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 15, 2011No. Civil Action 06-1637 (RJL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION [# 44]

RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Hein and Ellen Hettinga d/b/a Sarah Farms (“plaintiffs”), bring this action against the United States (“defendant” or “Government”) as a facial challenge to the constitutionality of two provisions of the Milk Regulatory Equity Act of 2005 (“MREA”), Pub.L. No. 109-215, 120 Stat. 328 (2006) (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 608c). They allege, in essence, that because they alone are subject to those provisions, MREA constitutes a bill of attainder and is also a violation of equal protection and due process. Now before the Court is the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hettinga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  2. Hettinga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. Weinstock v. Republic of the SudanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API