Hettinga v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION [# 44]
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Hein and Ellen Hettinga d/b/a Sarah Farms (“plaintiffs”), bring this action against the United States (“defendant” or “Government”) as a facial challenge to the constitutionality of two provisions of the Milk Regulatory Equity Act of 2005 (“MREA”), Pub.L. No. 109-215, 120 Stat. 328 (2006) (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 608c). They allege, in essence, that because they alone are subject to those provisions, MREA constitutes a bill of attainder and is also a violation of equal protection and due process. Now before the Court is the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hettinga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Hettinga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Weinstock v. Republic of the SudanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025